Early Life and Education
Polymath Mario Liek Serna was born on February 18, 1982, in Cali, Colombia. He is the son of Mario Serna Bedoya and Ligia Castaneda de Serna. He spent his formative years in Cali, receiving his initial education at the Military Academy Jose Maria Cabal, where he was recognized for his military discipline in ROTC. Additionally, he studied music at the Beethoven Conservatory in Cali. By the age of 11, he relocated to Rockford, Illinois, completing part of his high school education at Rockford East High. He later moved to Florida and graduated from Miami Senior High in 1999 with a distinction in General Sciences.
Military Service
Serna served as a Petty Officer Third Class in the United States Navy. He enlisted on January 5, 2003, began basic training on August 10, 2004, and graduated from basic training with class 305 at Naval Station Great Lakes, Illinois, in November 2004. He attended Delta firefighting training in Pensacola, Florida, and later enrolled in the SEALs BUD/S training, completing four weeks due to top-secret clearance requirements.
His service record includes one tour of duty from 2004 to 2008. Remarkably, he was the first in his rank to be awarded a Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal within his initial year of service. His commendations include various unit accolades.
In 2006, Serna participated in the Western Pacific deployment, contributing to War Exercises, VALIANT SHIELD, and RIMPAC. Throughout these exercises, he served as a Plane Captain, providing assistance to the VAW-116 early warning squadron and the Carrier Onboard Delivery Squadron on the CVN-72 Abraham Lincoln Nuclear Aircraft Carrier.
Serna was court-martialed in 2009 and dishonorably discharged from the U.S. Navy in 2011.
Post-Military Life
Serna currently operates as a freelance paralegal and legal translator/court interpreter.
Political Position
Although Serna’s political ideologies align with Conservative principles of the Republican Party, he has chosen to abstain from the electoral process.
Serna strongly opposes abortion, even in cases where pregnancy is the result of rape. He maintains that pregnancy can be avoided precisely on day 14 of the ovulation cycle, thus eliminating the need for abortion or cesarean section.
Serna supports euthanasia on a case-by-case basis but strongly discourages suicidal ideation. In his optimistic view, tomorrow always holds the potential to be a good day.
Education
Serna studied Human Applied Pathophysiology however abstained form continuing the program due to his personal ethic that conflicted with conventional medicine.
Functional Medical Network
Serna's circle of Physicians include: Dr./Dra. Veller; Dr. Suarez, (1950-2021); Dr. Mantzourani.; Dr. Otsuca; Dr. Wenliang (1985-2020).
Specific Areas of Knowledge
Serna is an autodidact underground scientist specializing in Statistical Mechanics and Newtonian Physics. He has expanded his theoretical and practical knowledge through independent study with experimental physical approaches, delving into subjects of speculative knowledge that transcend the conventional wisdom of the 21st century.
Underground Scientific Research and Investigations
Serna's scientific research spans a broad array of topics. Utilizing spectral ultraviolet lights, he identifies how ordinary plastics become highly toxic to humans, independent of their expiration date or recycling classification. This toxicity does lead to early-onset diseases such as cancer, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, cholesterol, and one that is controversial: psychological disorders involving gender dissociation in children. Serna elucidates how the human genome is undergoing centromere and telomere mutations, leading to significant alterations—all linked to overall plastic toxicity.
Serna utilizes electromagnetic fields and resonances to alter the biocircadian rhythm, thereby changing prokaryotic and somatic cells. He employs blue, blue-green, and red light shifting to stimulate the pineal gland, regulating body hormones. Additionally, he uses coffee blends to detoxify the body against free radicals responsible for localized cancer cells caused by hyperplasia's, which he refers to as "low oxygen cells" or "atrophied cells," among others.
In his perspective, humans start the aging process after age 30. By their 60s, they often face irreversible bone and muscle density issues, leading to approximately 20 years of continuous, overall decline, which he calls "Reverse Progressive Chain Reaction."
In mechanics, Serna further analyzed the "Bicycle Wheel Paradox" to implement it for better energy consumption and conservation.
A significant aspect of his research is dedicated to the mysterious global collapse of the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001. In his "Theory of Flutter,” Serna proposes that the collapse of the Twin Towers fulfilled the laws of physics in an unprecedented way, contrary to the initial views of experts.
Experts questioned how a small section of the upper fifteen floors could cause the global demolition of all the lower sections, seemingly violating Newton’s Third Law of Motion. Serna proposed that the secret to deciphering this phenomenon is rooted in understanding all Newton’s laws of motion along with the principle of conservation of momentum under varying temperature conditions. The extreme heat at the top section resulted in the formation of a High-Entropy Elinvar Alloy mass, causing enough kinetic energy to instantly destroy the lower sections beneath it. This aligns with Newton’s Third Law of Motion, which asserts that every action prompts an equal and opposite reaction. In this case, the elevated temperature caused the eighty thousand tons of this new alloy to impact the lower structures, acting as a hammer and instantly demolishing the bottom sections.
Although Serna’s "Theory of Flutter" has not been widely accepted, it seems to offer a plausible explanation for the global collapse of both towers.
Other scientific investigations into orbital mechanics involve the 1968 moon landing from the scope of science where he clarified the physical reasons why NASA had to falsify all of the evidence about this moon landing.
Serna also delves into the alleged Big Bang Theory explaining why it's inaccurate, and the alleged Theory of Evolution of Man, which suggests that humans evolved from apes which is also inaccurate.
It should be noted that humans have primate DNA traits, however this does not mean they evolved from this species of primate.
Serna assures that it will take 100 years so humans are able to accept where they come from.
Discussion on Abortion
Serna maintains an unbiased position, asserting that a fetus, regardless of its initial developmental stage, is considered a human being from the onset of pregnancy. This event typically takes place five days following the 14th day of the ovulation cycle.
Serna asserts that it is not necessary to surgically perform a Pregnancy Termination or Cesarean section if the embryo does not adhere to the uterine endometrium, also understanding that menstruation is part of the cycle, regardless of whether a pregnancy has occurred or not, five days after the 14th day of ovulation.
Misconception Leading to Confusion About when the life of a Fetus Start
Serna asserts that, the life a Fetus start after the embryo embeds into the Endometrium of the Uterus and this is referred as Official Pregnancy. Serna maintains that, the term "Ectopic Pregnancy" is misapplied in this case, since the embryo still has not yet reached and embed itself into the Uterus and this leads to a discussion without end.
Serna also maintains an unbiased position, asserting that a fetus, regardless of its initial developmental stage, is considered a human being from the onset of pregnancy. This event typically takes place five days following the 14th day of the ovulation cycle.
Discussion on the Dissociation of Gender Identity
Serna has spent part of his time understanding this new issue with identity disorder from a genetic standpoint. The idea here is to have a better world of harmony and unfortunately for some, harmony comes with logic.
A person, whether male or female, suffering from this type of genetic disorder, misinterprets and incorrectly apply factors that are scientifically considered extraordinary; however, the patient tends to see within its non-scientific observations, considering these wrong views to be part of a normal human evolution and ignoring the mental illness affecting them.
The Klinefelter syndrome occurs when a male is born with an extra X chromosome, resulting in a 47,XXY karyotype instead of the typical 46,XY. Klinefelter syndrome can lead to various physical, developmental, and psychological effects, including issues related to gender identity and expression.
Individuals with Klinefelter syndrome may experience symptoms such as reduced testosterone levels, which can affect physical development and potentially influence gender identity. However, it's important to note that gender identity is a complex interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors.
Serna explains that hormone therapy, particularly hormone replacement, is ineffective at altering the biological aspects of one's gender. In his view, if a male lacks testosterone, hormonal replacement can help boost testosterone levels. However, it cannot counteract or replace it with an antagonist hormone.
The implications of such treatments could be catastrophic, potentially leading to conditions such as reduced bone and muscle density, low blood oxygen levels, arthritis, osteoporosis, atherosclerosis, edema, and irregular heart rhythms.
Discussion about the Law of Roe v. Wade
This supreme court decision argues that a fetus is part of the woman's body and therefore becomes a pathology that can be treated surgically.
Roe v. Wade was centered around the constitutional right to privacy of the woman.
The Supreme Court ruled that this right to Due Process of the Fourteenth Amendment extends to a woman's decision treat the fetus as an organ.
The Court held that states could not ban abortions outright, but they could regulate them, especially in the interest of protecting maternal health and potential fetal life; however, the dead fetus wouldn't see it that way.
Serna does correct the language used and redirects the argument with questions of law, namely: Is a fetus considered an organ? What is considered problematic as a matter of law? At what stage of pregnancy a fetus is considered a living person? At what point is a woman (the mother) of the baby be able to decide about the fetus death? What is the different between causing a death by abortion compared to causing the death by euthanasia?
Euthanasia involves the intentional ending of a human's life to relieve suffering. On the other hand, Abortion is the intentional ending of a human's life due convenience.
If the baby is considered an acquired illness because it causes side effects to the mother, then by the same token, the illness shall be treated under the ICD-10 code and apply the proper treatment like any other organ.
Under the ICD-10, surgical extraction of body organs is generally coded for medical procedures, such as organ transplants or removals due to medical necessity such as cancer, gas gangrene, etc.
The amputation of a healthy organ without medical justification is generally illegal and can be considered assault or battery under criminal law where it can lead to title 18 criminal charges.
Therefore, if the fetus is considered an organ owned by the woman, it can not be amputated without a medical reason.
Further, Pro-choice shall not mean Pro-death.
Discussion about the Law of Brady v Maryland
The law of Brady v. Maryland (1963) is an intersection of constitutional law, prosecutorial lack of ethics, and systemic injustice during military court martials.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that withholding exculpatory evidence by the prosecution certainly violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and that, it has been established that, exculpatory evidence is any material that could favor the defendant, either by reducing guilt or punishment however, the Court later clarified that evidence is “material” only if there’s a reasonable probability it would have changed the outcome and that alone allows prosecutors to make subjective judgments about what or what not to disclose.
The Court ruled that Brady violations apply regardless of prosecutorial intent, yet in practice, courts often give leniency if misconduct wasn’t “deliberate,” which undermines the ruling’s spirit.
Strickland v. Washington created a two-pronged test for ineffective assistance of counsel:
Deficient performance: Counsel’s actions fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.
Prejudice: There’s a reasonable probability the outcome would’ve been different without those errors.
This standard is used across U.S. courts—including military courts—but its application in court-martial settings raises serious concerns.
Court-Martial Realities is different and opposite and certainly complicate Strickland with high conviction rates exceeding 90%, namely:
1. The chain of command can influence prosecutorial decisions, plea deals, and even judicial appointments—undermining the adversarial balance that Strickland assumes.
2. Defense attorneys in court-martials often face limited access to expert witnesses, investigative support, or time to prepare.
Yet under Strickland, they must prove not just poor performance but also that it changed the outcome—a nearly impossible task in a system stacked against them.
3. Plea Bargaining is the only escape hatch overwhelmed with coercion and threats. With this perverse incentive, if counsel is ineffective, the defendant may have “technically” received a fair trial under Strickland, simply because they pled guilty.
The requirement to show “prejudice” ignores the structural coercion that drives plea deals and limits defense strategy.
Serna assures that whether if the virus was made inside a lab or was a natural virus infecting through natural processes, it was not a deadly virus.
Serna reaches this conclusion after clinical data revealed that this virus uses active gram-positive bacteria during its two-week incubation period for its own benefit during the phase of attachment, replication and infection. He assures the viral load is directly proportional to the competence or deficiency of the host's immune system, not of the virus itself. In most cases, based on medical logic, a host with a compromised immune system is at greater risk of infection and level of contagiousness than a host with a competent immune system.
In the case of Covid-19, the level of contagiousness was greater that (R0) meaning, the infected person would at least infect (1) person; and this did not mean the virus was a strong virus but, people immune system was deficient and therefore the viral load was heavier opposed to people that had a good immune system.
People with a good immune system would be infected by the virus, but this process occurred at a molecular level and without symptoms, therefore they were not contagious, contrary to what experts opined. The transmission mechanism occurred with the activation of histamine receptors, that is, the virus came out through the mouth contaminating surfaces, but it does not mean the virus entered through the respiratory airways, and this is the reason why many people died during the Covid-19 pandemic; all covered their nose and mouth and completely disregarded their hands and eyes. lying to people about wearing masks was a good thing, since they actually thought masks protected (them) individually so, they wore it at all times successfully preventing infecting surfaces.
Discussion About the Death Penalty
Serna is in favor of the death penalty; however, against death by injection, gas chamber or electric chair.
The penalty must be relatively proportional to the crime committed and the evidence obtained must establish the presence of the crime incorporating objective and subjective elements to demonstrate that the crime was actually committed and not subject of speculation or negotiation which is what precisely occurs during all court martials 99.9% of the time.
Serna believes that punishment must be administered in a humane manner. This approach insist that punishment should not be about causing suffering for the sake of suffering, but about promoting a safer and more just society for both the citizen and the criminal.
Serna opines that, 10grams of pushed Propofol regardless of political issues will effectively caused death by hypoxia.
A good example of a humane manner to terminate the prisoner's life is the same manner by which an animal is put to sleep without suffering.
Discussion About the Constitutional Protection of The Criminal
Serna asserts that the perpetrator committing the crime, should not be granted the same constitutional protections as their victims, these constitutional protections should operate retroactively to protect the victim, rather than favoring the criminal.
In no case can the constitutional rights of a criminal prevail over the constitutional rights of the victim to the extent that one restricts or takes advantage of the other.
While in the legal discussion about who can have more constitutional force, logic dictates that the criminal automatically loses his constitutional rights if he/she is guilty by a preponderance of the evidence.
Discussion About Court-Martial Sentences
Serna asserts that the fairness of a court has significant importance in the justice system. It ensures transparency under the color of law.
A judge must remain impartial, basing their decisions solely on the evidence presented without bias or corruption.
The ultimate goal of any court is to deliver justice. When fraud is present, it can prevent justice from being served, as they can lead to innocent people being punished or guilty individuals going free.
Military courts-martial employ and enjoy a very high conviction rate exceeding 92%. This substantial percentage successfully obscures the path of the Brady rule and becomes a reality during bias courts-martial.
When a court operates under the principle of ‘Beyond a Reasonable Doubt’, the accused is entitled to maintain their constitutional rights until they are factually proven guilty, in accordance with the law.
The principle of 'Beyond the Reasonable Doubt', should be based upon logic. For instance, if I declare during an interrogation that: "I flew yesterday over the Miami International Airport drunk', applying the elements of logic this can not happen and therefore this could not be a confession because, I am neither in Miami nor do I know how to fly an aircraft and, most importantly, I don't drink either therefore, charges of flying without a pilots license and under the influence, could not be applicable in this case but, in a court martial, this will happen, you will end up with charges of this type and sentenced based on what you declared and I am expressing based on what happened to me.
Further, rather than investigating the subject matter thoroughly to confirm or detect inconsistencies, they opt to inundate the case with charges to force a plea deal
Later, the convicted returns to court, filing for illegal arrest, illegal/wrongful conviction, prejudice and 60(d)(3) fraud and win because, the court couldn't and can't possibly prove a negative, which in this context, relates to an unsubstantiated claim, metaphorically "flying over the international air space without a pilot's license and under the influence.
Discussion About the 2021 United States Capitol Attack
The initial and peaceful welcome turned violent calling it an acts of insurrection and did not represent mainstream Trump supporters based on the withheld evidence.
Discussion About the Russian- Ukraine War
This invasion is characterized as a border dispute where the main goal and interest is to prevent the advance of NATO into Ukraine.
The Death of Charlie Kirk
Two months before his assassination, Charlie had already gathered information about the government being involved in the production of the drug Fentanyl to sell it to the cartels. He was also a potential candidate for the next presidential term.
Marital Relationship
Serna is currently married to Sandra Jeanette Suarez.
No comments:
Post a Comment